Comparison with a life satisfaction measure shows that valuable information would be lost if well-being was measured by life satisfaction. These profiles offer fresh insight into cultural differences in well-being, and indicate which features may provide the most promising targets for policies to improve well-being. There are also striking differences in country profiles across the 10 features. Application of this definition to respondents from the 23 countries which participated in the European Social Survey (Round 3) reveals a four-fold difference in flourishing rate, from 41% in Denmark to less than 10% in Slovakia, Russia and Portugal. An operational definition of flourishing is developed, based on psychometric analysis of indicators of these ten features, using data from a representative sample of 43,000 Europeans. hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being: competence, emotional stability, engagement, meaning, optimism, positive emotion, positive relationships, resilience, self esteem, and vitality. These combine feeling and functioning, i.e. By examining internationally agreed criteria for depression and anxiety (DSM and ICD classifications), and defining the opposite of each symptom, we identify ten features of positive well-being. Well-being is seen as lying at the opposite end of a spectrum to the common mental disorders (depression, anxiety). But how should well-being be measured? A conceptual framework is offered which equates high well-being with positive mental health. Governments around the world are recognising the importance of measuring subjective well-being as an indicator of progress.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |